This has been confirmed. You may proceed accordingly.
The Bureau of Fish Classification undertook a thorough, multi-year assessment of tuna. The question before the Bureau was straightforward. The answer was also straightforward. The process was not particularly long.
Tuna is a fish. It has been a fish for approximately 35 million years, which predates the Bureau's founding by a considerable margin. The Bureau is comfortable confirming findings that precede it.
Tuna is also, by all available accounts, a yummy dish. Consumer testimony on this point has been consistent across cultures, centuries, and preparation methods. The Bureau does not typically weigh in on taste, but in this case the consensus was difficult to ignore.
No further verification is anticipated at this time. Should the status of tuna change, the Bureau will issue an updated report. We do not expect this to happen.
"I had suspected tuna was a fish for some time. The Bureau's report confirmed this. I felt relief, but also a certain flatness, like the confirmation of something you already knew. I am eating tuna now. It is good."
"My daughter asked me if tuna was a fish. I told her to wait while I consulted the Bureau. The Bureau confirmed it was. My daughter had moved on by the time I returned. She was eating a sandwich. It had tuna in it."
"I submitted a tip to the Bureau about a fish I was unsure about. They said it was not tuna. They said it was a halibut. I thanked them. They did not respond. I ate the halibut anyway. It was also yummy."
If you have encountered a fish and require classification, the Bureau is here. If you believe you have encountered something that is not a fish but behaves as one, the Bureau is also here. Submit your report below. All tips are reviewed.